Skip to main content

Retribution



Tanya Taqag
Retribution


from and for our discussion of The Safety Zone
"Which Native beliefs and practices might be judged safe, innocuous, and tolerable?"
"Which Native beliefs and practices are too dangerous, different, and subversive of mainstream values?"
"How best to manage or eradicate dangerous cultural expression?" 
(Lomawaima & McCarty, 2006:5)

see pages 42-45 in McCarty (LPP: History, Theory, Praxis)

What is the Safety Zone Theory?
What are its strengths?
What are its limitations?
Why is it important for this text?
Labels:

Popular posts from this blog

Jhumpa Lahiri

Read more

Anna/Everyday

She Blinded Me With Science from her website:   Anna/Everyday I am Anna Lauren Hoffmann, a scholar and writer working at the intersections of data, technology, culture, and ethics. I am currently an Assistant Professor with The Information School at the University of Washington. Before that, I worked as a postdoctoral scholar with the UC Berkeley School of Information at the University of California, Berkeley. My work centers on issues in information, data, and ethics, with particular attention to the ways in which discourses, design, and uses of information technology can promote or hinder the pursuit of important human values like respect and justice. In particular, I am interested in how the standards and categories imposed on the world through data, information, and technological systems (or the ways we talk about them) can discriminate by supporting the development of self-respect for some and hindering its development for othe...
Read more

Human 3.0

Read more